The Hawkins County Years |
It is unknown exactly when
John Sr. arrived in Hawkins County, Tennessee. Comparing the documents of the
pension file to the last record in Russell County, suggests that this took place
sometime between December of 1834 and December of 1836. John made application
for a pension in July of 1837 in Hawkins County. No records have been found to
confirm where John might have been between January of 1835 to December 1836.
A statement from William
Byrd in Hawkins County, Tennessee reveals that John had been living in Hawkins
County for at least one year prior to his pension application. Mr. Byrd states
he had known John since his move to Hawkins County for about twelve months. This
statement was made in December of 1837 and places John in Hawkins County in
December of 1836. John is missing from the records of Russell County, Virginia
and Hawkins County, Tennessee from January 1835 to December of 1836. He might
have gone back to Clay County, Kentucky during this time. (Byrd-1837)
(Page 2)
A document dated July 18,
1845, in the pension file of John Sr. states that John and some of his family
members lived in Russell County, Virginia for about six years. After removing
from Russell County, he moved to Kentucky and then to Hawkins County, Tennessee.
This statement by John Sr. suggests that only John moved to Kentucky after six
years in Russell County, Virginia. His children remained in Russell County.
(John Sr-1845)
A statement in 1837 made
by James Burke of Hawkins County, previously from Clay County, Kentucky states
that “he became acquainted with John in Clay County about twelve years prior to
the date of his statement. This places John in Clay County, Kentucky in 1826.
If Mr. Burke recalled the time correctly then this would suggest that John left
Russell County, Virginia around 1826 and moved to Clay County, Kentucky. It is
undetermined as to how long John may have stayed in Clay County. (Burke-1837)
Obviously, John came back
to Russell County, Virginia by 1830, for he is found in the census of that year
in Russell County. Possibly, John worked at the Goose Creek Salt Mines in Clay
County until he had saved enough money to buy property in Russell County. John
later sold property in Russell County in December of 1834. The copy of the
original record involving this transaction will be posted.
He probably also paid some
of the attorney fee in 1828 when he obtained representation for his son, John
Jr. I assume by these records, that John probably moved back to Russell County
sometime during the incident of the counterfeit coin that his son, John Jr. had
been charged with. However, it is possible that John only returned for the court
hearing.
John may have been living
at the home of one of his daughter’s between December of 1834 and December of
1836 in Hawkins or one of the nearby counties as well. The records suggest that
several of his daughters may have been living in the Hawkins County area before
1840 and possibly the nearby counties of Grainger and Claiborne.
The facts are, the records
show that John was in Russell County, Virginia as late as December of 1834 and
in Hawkins County by December of 1836 where he applied for his military pension
on July 7, 1837 in Hawkins County.
John Sr. applied for his
military pension at the old courthouse in Rogersville (Hawkins County) Tennessee
before John Mitchell, Esquire. John was admitted to the pension rolls on
October 2, 1837. It was declared that he was entitled to $80.00 per anum (per
year) and he was to be paid commencing on the 4th of March 1831 and payable
semi-annually on the 4th of March and the 4th of September each year. (Admission
1837)
John was required to
satisfactorily submit proof of his service in the Revolution for which John
submitted a declaration. His declaration concerning his service gave accounts of
the movements of the army during John’s service until he was wounded. A typed
copy of this can be seen in the Scalf Family History. However, a copy of the
original will also be presented. (Declaration-1837,
page 1) (Declaration-1837,
page 2) (Declaration-1837,
page 3)
By September 18, 1838
John’s pension was revoked. He had received two installments before Mr. Hopkins
(attorney) of Russell County had issued a letter to Mr. J. L. Edwards,
Commissioner of Pensions accusing John of obtaining a fraudulent pension. It
appears that this correspondence began before or near the time John received his
first installment on his pension. This began a long series of statements and
depositions from Hawkins County in support of restoration of the pension. This
also began an even more destitute life for John and Edy than they had suffered
previously.
No doubt, John and Edy
thought life would be better for them in Hawkins County since John would now be
eligible for a pension for his war service. Little did they know that the
grudge held by old enemies in Russell County would return to haunt them in
Hawkins County.
John proved his service so well during this process, it would be difficult not
to believe he was a Revolutionary Soldier. Several outstanding and notable
citizens tried to assist John in the restoration of this pension. Several
submitted statements of having served with John and one witness presented his
statement of having been with John when he was wounded and examined the wound
himself. (Hall statement, page 1)
(Hall statement, page 2) (Hall
statement, page 3)
David Rogers, who had been a Captain and a Major in the Revolution had spent a night drilling John on military procedures and having satisfied himself that John had been a soldier signed made his statement in support of the pension. This was ignored by Mr. Edwards as if the statement was as false as he felt John’s statement was. (Rogers statement, Page 1) (Rogers statement, page 2) (Rogers statement, page 3)
Considering the
information, one would have to wonder just what was going on behind the scenes
since John did not have to submit this type of proof in the beginning when he
was admitted to the rolls. It was not until Andrew Johnson of Greenville,
Tennessee (later the 17th President) intervened, that John’s pension was
restored. Eight or nine years would pass from the time the pension was revoked
until it would be restored again. During this time, John and Edy would live on
the charity of their children and neighbors. Shortly after this, a
letter dated September 16, 1838 from Lebanon (Russell County) Virginia, written
by G. W. Hopkins to J. L. Edwards, Esq., Commissioner of Pensions, states that
John’s claim was fraudulent and that he had never reputed white hair or to have
been a soldier of the Revolution and had never set up such pretense. The
correspondence record of Mr. Edwards reveals that he had received this letter
from Mr. G. W. Hopkins of Russell County, Virginia, who was an upcoming
politician and may have been a member of the House of Representatives at this
time. The records show Mr. Hopkins did become a representative at some point.
In December of 1837
Brittan Scalf is found in the records of Russell County, Virginia recording the
purchase of land from Thomas Tate. Brittan’s wife’s name is spelled Delitha on
this record but descendants state that her name was Talitha.
A document found in the
file of John Sr. states that John did receive his first pension payment on April
3, 1838 and again in September. The arrears allotted were in the amount of
$600.00. (File-April 3, 1838)
On April 3 of 1838,
Brittan was appointed surveyor of the road again in Russell County, Virginia.
April 3, 1838 — page 501
Ordered that Brittan Scalf
be appointed Surveyor of the road from the top of the hill west of Jefferson
Jessee’s to Richard Longs in the room of Richard B. Long, and that James
Dickenson gent, do furnish him with a list of Tithables. (Russell County Court
Minutes, April 3, 1838, pg. 501) (Brittan-April 3, 1838-pg-501)
In this same month and
year, Abraham McClellan of Blountville, Tennessee (Sullivan County) a member of
the House of Representatives was brought into the pension case by Mr. Mitchell
of Hawkins County. Mr. Mitchell had sent Mr. McClellan a letter and asked him
to find out about the case of John Scalf’s pension.
Mr. Mitchell states that
he had sent evidence of John’s service to Mr. Edwards several times last fall
but had not heard from him. This suggests that John began his appeal for a
pension in the fall of 1837. Mr. McClellan then wrote to Mr. Edwards and asked
him to please examine the papers and let him know how the case stood and if
further proof of his service was needed. (McClellan to Edwards-April 4, 1838)
John was admitted to the
pension rolls by March of 1838. In this year, John received two installments of
his pension and life was undoubtedly better for him and Edy. However, in the
coming fall John would be stricken from the pension rolls after his second
installment was received.
In August of 1838, John
Jr. and wife, Patsy are in court in Russell County. This time, the suit is
dismissed. (I do not have the copy of this suit at this time, but hope to have
this posted soon).
The record below does not
appear to be related to the slander case as the plaintiff, Elizabeth Gose, asked
that this case be dismissed. I have not found the beginning of this suit or what
it concerns.
August 8, 1838 — page 532
Elizabeth Gose plaintiff
vs.
John Scalf and wife defendant>
By order of the plaintiff,
this suit is dismissed.
(Gose vs. Scalf-Aug. 8, 1838, pg. 532)
Mr. Hopkins suggested that
the claim ought to be re-investigated and John stricken from the rolls. Mr.
Hopkins had been the attorney representing the case of the counterfeit coin for
John Jr. in Russell County, Virginia. (Hopkins to Edwards-1838)
Mr. Edwards then sent a
letter to Mr. McClellan requesting information concerning John’s credibility and
character. On October 22,1838, after John had received his second installment on
his pension, Abraham McClellan responded Mr. Edward’s letter. In response to Mr.
Edwards investigation of John Sr.’s character, Mr. McClellan answered that Mr.
Scalf lived about seventy-five miles from him. A quote from the letter is
excerpted here.
“Mr. Scalf resides about
75 miles from me and I have not been able to learn much in relation to the facts
which you wish to know. I have seen since the reception of your letter, a
gentleman by the name of Kildair who is a neighbor of Scalf, — he says that
Thos. Pratt, the witness in the case is an old man whose word is intitled to
some credit, but it is believed in the neighborhood that he is deceived about
this man and that Scalf is not old enough to have been in the Revolution. The
other witnesses are Sons in law of Mr. Scalf. So says my informant.”
(McClellan to Edwards-Oct. 22,1838)
By December of 1838, the
Justice of the Peace in Hawkins County again sent further information to Mr.
Edwards to establish the validity of John’s claim. From these statements and the
statement of a Mr. Klidaire to Abraham McClellan, we learn the relationship of
several persons to John Sr.
From the letter of Abraham
McClellan and the statement of Thomas Lockard in December of 1838, we learn the
relationships of Squire Williams, Thomas Lockard and Alexander Trent to John
Scalf Sr. There were neighbors of John Scalf who gave statements that were
contrary to what Mr. Kildaire had stated to Abraham McClellan. In conjunction
with this record and the statement of Thomas Lockard in 1838 it appears that
Thomas Lockhard and Cecilia Scalf were married around 1834 or 1835.
If correct, the previous
writings would place Cecilia’s age around ten or eleven years old in 1834
according to the birth date listed for her. Contrary to popular belief, girls in
Appalachia did not commonly marry at this age. This was especially true during
this time. Females were required to have the consent of a parent or guardian
when obtaining a marriage license if under the age of twenty-one.
A bondsman would be
required to sign the bond to insure the credibility of the folks applying for
the license. These bonds were set in very high amounts in some areas. One such
area required a bond of $300. Most folks were not going to risk everything they
owned in the event someone may have been dishonest in their statements.
It was not impossible for
Cecilia to marry at a young age, but it would have been very unlikely that she
married this young during this time. I am of the opinion that Cecilia was born
before 1823. The marriages of young girls around the ages of twelve and thirteen
began much later than this. Not to say there were not some that appeared to have
married this young. Most likely, many of these (not all) were due to errors made
in their age during the times.
There were at least three
letters written to Mr. McClellan by Mr. Edwards between September 28, 1838 and
December 27, 1838. It also appears from the record of correspondence kept by Mr.
Edwards that this issue concerning John Sr. began sometime in April of 1838
shortly after John received his first installment in March of 1838 and the
decision was reached by September or October of this year to discontinue the
pension. Possibly Mr. Hopkins started his pursuit of having the pension revoked
while John was submitting his information to be admitted to the rolls. If so,
the correspondence for this is missing from the file. Conversations may have
taken place in Washington among those involved and details not issued in
letters. This may be why some of the letters are not included.
A record in December of
1838 consists of the statements of Thomas Lockard, Squire Williams, Alexander
Trent, James Burke, and Captain William Byrd. These statements came after the
pension was revoked in September. Many statements came from Hawkins County and
lasted through a portion of 1846 with the last appeal being made by Andrew
Johnson of Greenville, Tennessee. Physicians were called in to examine John’s
wounds and give an opinion as well. All of this was to no avail for the old
soldier. Regardless of the evidence John Sr. produced, it was to fall on deaf
ears to the Pension Commissioner.
In his deposition, Thomas
Lockard stated that he had known John for about three years. This indicates that
Thomas and Cecilia (Sela/Cela) Scalf Lockard (probably named after her aunt
Ceely Ann Koziah/Keziah) had only been married a short time and most likely
married 1834-1838. If correct, Cecelia could be the female listed in the home
of Thomas Lockhard on the 1840 census and the older lady in the home was most
likely his mother.
Thomas was listed as 20–30
and a female in the home is listed as 15–20. A son under five is also listed.
There is one female age 5–10 and one aged 10–15. It is not likely that the
female 10–15 would have been the daughter of Thomas and Cecilia if they did
marry 1834-1838.. This female could have been from a previous marriage of Thomas
or may have been a sister of Thomas.
An older female is in the
home and listed as 40–50. The female 15–20 is likely Cecilia. According to
this, it is possible she was the last child of John and Edy, and born around
1820 or shortly before. However, her age could have been misstated on this
census as well if this is Cecilia, and she might have actually belonged in the
20–30 age range. This is from a transcribed copy of the census. (Lockard, Dec-
1838)
Squire Williams stated
that he had, had a most satisfactory acquaintance with John for fifteen years.
This would indicate that Squire and Dicy might have married around 1823-1825.
The 1830 census of Russell County, does lend some support to this. On this
census they have two daughters listed between the ages of 5-10 years old with an
estimated birth date of around 1825–1830. Unless they had children before this
that had died, these were the oldest children. According to this, Dicy should
have been on the 1820 census in the home of her father, John Sr. but she was not
and the only other explanation for this that comes to mind is she was living
with another family as a domestic servant in 1820. (Williams-Dec.1838)
Alexander Trent states
that he had known John for better than eight years and lived nearby him the
greater part of that time. Interestingly, Alexander also stated that he knew
John in Clay County, Kentucky for part of this time. This might indicate that
Alexander Trent who married Polly Scalf had lived in Clay County, Kentucky prior
to moving to Hawkins County, Tennessee. However, I find no Trent families in
Clay County, Kentucky. (Trent-Dec.1838)
I also find no Trent
families in Floyd County, Kentucky in 1810 when John’s family was living there.
In light of this statement, Alexander had known John since 1830. He most likely
had met and married Polly sometime between 1830-1838 either in Clay County or in
Hawkins after the move in 1834-35. This also indicates that John made a trip
back to Clay County, Kentucky and possibly when he left Russell County in 1834.
If Alexander and Polly were married at that time, they may have gone with John
to Clay County, or he with them.
Information from the 1850
Claiborne County, Tennessee census suggests that Alexander and Polly’s fist
child, Isaiah, was born 1831. This suggests that Alexander and Polly were
married in or around 1830. John Sr. is on the 1830 census of Russell County,
Virginia, but Polly was not in the home. This also suggests that John Sr. may
have been in Clay County, Kentucky shortly before 1830 and returned to Russell
County by the time of the census enumeration.
John possibly left Russell
County around 1825-1830 and went to Clay County where Polly met and married
Alexander. Since this is between censuses, we have no way of knowing unless a
marriage record is found for Polly and Alexander. This couple later moved to
Hawkins County, Tennessee. They possibly married in Russell County, moved to
Clay County and John went there after he sold the land in Russell County in
1834. A number of speculations can be raised here. Without a marriage record or
land deed, we have no way of confirming anything.
The facts are; Alexander
Trent married Polly Scalf and moved to Hawkins, then Claiborne County,
Tennessee. Their first child was born 1831 unless they had children that had
died before this. Polly would have been in her late 30s or early 40s when she
married Alexander. This also suggests Polly may have married prior to Alexander
or was living in another home on the 1820 census of Russell County, Virginia. A
search of the marriages of Floyd or Clay County might reveal a marriage record
for Nancy, Polly and possibly even Betsy and Nancy.
It is very possible that
Nancy met and married her husband in Kentucky and remained there when John Sr.
left Floyd County. I have corresponded with the Collins researchers and no one
at this point has a Nancy in their line for this period in the Russell County,
Virginia area or the Hawkins, Grainger, Hancock, Union County, Tennessee areas.
This leads me to believe that Nancy did not leave Kentucky and possibly Betsy as
well, for no one is able to identify either of these girls from the East
Tennessee area. I possibly have not spoken to the right person yet but at this
point, the Collins researchers I have had contact with seem to know nothing
about either of these women.
The correspondence record
kept by Mr. Edwards of the Pension Commission reveals that correspondence
concerning the validity of the pension began very early in the same year that
John’s pension was awarded. Time was not wasted in trying to stop this pension.
No doubt, not knowing what would take place, Patsy had mentioned the pension
application while visiting her relatives in Russell County, Virginia before John
was admitted to the rolls.
This correspondence
continued through December of 1838 and the correspondence record, reads as
follows:
let. 23 Apr. 38 Hon. A.
McClellan
to Hon. A. McClellan on
October 30, 1838
to Hon. A. McClellan
December 27, 1838 (Correspondence Record)
As the son-in-laws of John
Sr. were making their statements of support in Rogersville, Mr. Edwards was
corresponding with Mr. McClellan in Blountville (Sullivan County) a neighboring
county of Hawkins.
The last letter to Mr.
McClellan was dated April 20, 1840 so it is obvious that Mr. McClellan was
involved in this case for a good deal of time. Mr. Mitchell, Justice of the
Peace of Hawkins County had first appealed to Mr. McClellan in 1838 for his help
in requesting a response from Washington concerning the papers Mr. Mitchell had
sent to the Pension Commission to obtain the pension.
The year of 1838 closes
with the statements from James Burke, Thomas Lockard, Squire Williams, Alexander
Trent, and Captain William Byrd. These statements were made on
Christmas Day in 1838.
In this year, Brittan is
found charged with a debt of $39.00 and is ordered to pay the debt. This was
probably related to the business that Brittan owned.
Wednesday, June 5th 1839
— page 52
Andy F. Hendricks plaintiff
against
Brittan Scalf defendant
This day came the
plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant not yet appearing, it is considered
by the Court, that the judgment obtained in the Clerk’s office be made final and
that the plaintiff recover against the debt $39. 23 the debt in the declaration
mentioned with interest thereon to be compensated after the act of (?) per
annum from the 2d day of August 1837 till paid and his costs by him about his (sinc
in their behalf expended)? (Brittan-June5 1839-pg. 52)
The pension file records
very little activity in the year 1839 for the Scalf family in both Russell and
Hawkins County. A number of letters were sent to the Pension Commission in this
year trying to establish John’s credibility, only to be ignored. Most of this
correspondence is repetitious and repeats the credibility of John’s word and
character. Very little information is gleaned from these documents; however,
they do establish the feelings of the neighbors concerning the character of John
Scalf. Sr. These documents have not been added to this writing due to the
tremendous amount of time in scanning.
In 1839, Anthony Hall of
Perry County, Kentucky came to the aid of his fellow comrade, John Sr. Mr. Hall
stated that he knew that John had been a Revolutionary Soldier for he had became
acquainted with him previous to the battle of Guilford and that he had seen John
in this battle where John was shot in the leg. He also stated that it was not
uncommon to see a boy of no more than 14 years of age fighting in the war. He
states that John was older than General Jackson and about one year older than
himself. Mr. Hall was on the pension rolls and was receiving $8 per annum.
(Anthony Hall-July, 1839)(Page
2)(Page 3)
Mr. Edwards responded that
this was not satisfactory to restore the pension and sends a list of questions
for John to answer. This appears to be another avoidance of the issue. This
amounted to nothing more than to delay the restoration of the pension.
Nevertheless, John answered the questions and Mr. Edwards appeared to take no
further action in restoring the pension.
The year 1840 finds John
Sr., John Jr., Ira Scalf, Alexander Trent, Alexander W. Trent, Alexander Trent,
Sr., and Thomas Lockhart/Lockard all living in near proximity to each other in
Hawkins County, Tennessee.
There were also Collins
and Williams families in Hawkins at this time but it is unknown if they were the
same as the families John’s daughters had married.
William Bird/Byrd is also
in the neighborhood. Mr. Byrd gave his statement in support of John’s pension
and might have been John’s landlord at Byrd’s Corner. John Sr. and Edy were now
alone. Both their ages were listed in the 60–70 age range once again. This is
another indication of the loss of memory as John and Edy aged. Their ages at
this time should have been 70 – 80. However, John Sr. is listed as being the
same age as he was in 1830.
A very good example of the
loss of memory concerning the children’s ages is depicted in the statements of
Edy Carlisle made in June of 1851 and again in October of the same year. Just
four months after Edy stated that her oldest daughter was Polly Scalf, she
states that her oldest daughter was Nancy Scalf; leaving us to wonder which
child was actually the oldest child. Nancy’s birth date is stated as March 22,
1788 and Polly, April 29, 1789. Edy states the death of her husband as March 10,
1848 in Greene County. In another document, Edy states that he died at the home
of his son _______in Greene County, Tennessee. The name of the son was faded
out but Berryman was the only son living in this particular area at this time. (Edy-Jun
7, 1851) (Edy-Oct 6, 1851)
I have found this to
happen frequently on the census records, as one got older. Edy was around 80
years old when she made the above statements. I find it remarkable that Edy
could remember the exact birth dates even though she did misstate the names.
Most folks remembered the order of birth much easier than the actual dates. Had
I given birth to sixteen children, traveled across the country and lived as Edy
had, I doubt I would have remembered their names or birth dates at 40 years old,
much less at 80.
The most accuracy I have
found concerning “near correct” ages have been the first census records to list
the family. The parents were more likely to remember the correct ages from the
time they were born until at least the first census if the census was enumerated
within a few years of the birth. However, memory loss became evident by the
enumeration of the next census. As time went by, parents not only forgot their
own ages, but the ages of their children as well.
This was a time when age
was not important Survival was number one on the agenda. The remembrance of
one’s age was of little importance and probably due in part to the fact that
records were not required as they now are.
1840 Hawkins County, TN
census
Scalf, John Sr.
Estimated birth dates
1 male 60 – 70
1770 - 1780
1 female 60 – 70
1770 - 1780
A number of Trent families
were living in the area on this census. However, an Alexander O. Trent is
living two houses away from William Scalf. The home of Thomas Trent is located
between the two. In the process of elimination of which Alexander was the
husband of Polly, correspondence with a Trent descendant relates the following.
Quote: “Alexander O.
Trent, about the same age as Alex/Polly Scalf, married a Mary Martin, whom I
guess was sometimes called Polly, too.” This Alexander was living in the same
area and is later found in Hancock County, Tennessee listed around the same age
as the husband of Polly. (Ref: Barbara Marsh)
The only indication that
Polly’s name was Mary is from the 1850 Claiborne County, Tennessee census where
she is listed as Mary Trent. This would be the only documentation to this if
this is the correct family on this census.
The name of William Scalf
living in the neighborhood was transcribed as William SEALF on one copy of this
census. (See 1840 Hw. Co. census at:
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Ranch/8115/hawkins1840.html - page
247.
This does not appear to be
the William Scalf, son of John Sr. and is most likely a grandson although it is
debatable at this time as to which family this William belongs to. This William
was 20–30 years old according to this census and his wife is listed as 15–20
years old. This calculates a birth date of 1810–1820 for William and 1820–1825
for his wife.
Another female is listed
as 10–15 years old. It should be noted here as well that the name Tabitha listed
on the transcribed census copies is listed as Talitha on the original microfilm
of Claiborne County, Tennessee in 1850. (Could this possibly be one of the
children of Brittan and Talitha not found by the descendants?) The descendants
of Brittan and Talitha report that eight children can be documented for Brittan
and Talitha. However, there seems to be no documentation that there were nine
children or nineteen. (1850 Claiborne, Co. census)
The Claiborne County,
Tennessee census of 1850 suggests that William and Talitha married around 1840,
probably just prior to this census. The oldest child in the home in 1850
(Claiborne Co.) was Henry at nine years old. The female listed in the home in
1840 (Hawkins Co) could have been a sister to either William or Talitha but
would have been too near the age of Talitha to be their child. Again, this
applies only if Talitha’s age was correct on this census.
Pages 236 and 237 of the
1840 Hawkins transcribed census is not transcribed at this date; therefore, some
of these families will not be found at the above URL address. I have referred
back to my transcribed copy of the original microfilm for the information on the
above Scalf/Trent families. It is unknown which family this Talitha Scalf
belonged to. Her maiden name appears to have been Scalf and certainly
suggestive of a child of Brittan and Talitha.
It is interesting to note
that sometime during the year of 1840, either John Sr. visited Abraham McClellan
and requested his help, or Mr. McClellan responded to someone in a neighboring
county and assisted him in pleading for the restoration of the pension. The
following is quoted from the records housed in the Library of Congress.
“Mr. McClellan presented a
petition of John Scalf, of Hawkins County, State of Tennessee, a soldier of the
Revolution, praying for a pension.” (Journal of the House of Representatives of
the United States, 1789-1873, May 19, 1840, pg. 962-Library of Congress)
I find no follow up record at this date suggesting that any action was taken on this and the pension records of John Sr. suggest that if it was, it apparently did not succeed.
In 1840, only Lee and the
Brittan Scalf family were found still living in Russell County. Lee Scalf is
found only one time on the census records (1840 Russell Co.) that I have found
and no further information has been found for this family. Some of the unplaced
family members in the East Tennessee and West Virginia area may belong to the
Lee Scalf family.
John had reached the point
where he no longer could pay for the Seal required to authenticate the
statements. Many of the neighbors appealed on John’s behalf as well as his
children, Polly Scalf Trent, John Jr. and his wife, Patsy Counts Scalf. When
time permits, the original copies will be posted. Some of these depositions can
be found in Chapter IV of the Scalf Family History.
These depositions proved
worthless to the Pension Commission but have been invaluable to the descendants
of John Scalf Sr. in our research. Had it not been for these depositions, we
would know little of the Scalf history.
It is interesting to note
that in the year, 1843, John was apparently living with one of his children at
Thorn Hill in Grainger County, Tennessee for sometime during this year John
visited Mr. James K. McAnally, (title unknown) to appeal for help. Mr. McAnally
appealed to Mr. William T. Senter to call on Mr. Edwards. No date for this
record is found in the file but a document found in the file indicates that Mr.
Senter questioned Mr. Edwards. A letter of response to someone who might have
been Mr. Edwards or possibly Mr. Hopkins is found in the file. It appears to be
addressed to the House of Representatives and Mr. Edwards was of the Pension
Commission so most likely, this was sent to Mr. Hopkins who was now a
Representative. This letter is dated January 6, 1844. This does not appear to
have accomplished anything more than had been accomplished previously. (McAnally
to Sutter) (Sutter to HR-Jan.6, 1844)
Back in Russell County in 1844, Brittan had been appointed as a guard of the prisoners at the jail in
Russell County. The records relate that he was paid $2.76 for his guard duties.
Tuesday, October 8th 1844 — page 406
The following accounts were presented in Court, and allowed; it appearing to the Court that former
guards were necessary to the safe conveyance of the prisoners to the jail of Russell County, which is ordered to be certified to the Auditor of public
accounts; Benjamin Haley, $2.76; Brittan Scalf $2. 76; Hezakiah Hamon $2.76 and William Hale $2.76. (Brittan, Oct. 8, 1844-pg-406)
On July 8, 1845, in
Russell County, Virginia, Brittan is found in the records for the last time. In
the same month of 1845 only nine days later, his brother, John Jr., sister Polly
and sister-in-law, Patsy Counts Scalf would give their depositions in Hawkins
County in support of the pension restoration. It is believed that Brittan died
sometime after this record was recorded. This record was for the sale of land
from Britain and wife to Andrew Williams. Although I have not been able to
confirm this, it is possible that Andrew Williams was a relative of Squire
Williams, husband of Dicy Scalf. Tuesday, July 8th 1845 — page 452
A list of Conveyances
admitted to record by the Clerk of the Court since the last Term.
An Indenture of bargain
and sale for land from Brittan Scalf & wife to Anderson Williams, acknowledged
before two Justices. (Brittan-1845-pg. 452)
Sometime after this
transaction, it is reported that Brittan’s tragic death was due to a falling
tree while surveying the roads in Russell County, Virginia. Brittan was still
living at the time of Patsy Counts Scalf’s deposition in 1845 and it is unknown
if he died this year or early in 1846. His brother, William II had already died
by the time of Patsy’s statement in July of 1845.
On July 17, 1845, Patsy
Counts Scalf gave a deposition in Rogersville (Hawkins County) Tennessee that
would reveal in detail the reasons behind the pension being revoked. Through
this deposition we have learned the names of all of the children of John and Edy
as well as the number of their children at this date.
There seems to be
confusion about the number of children belonging to Brittan Scalf and Talitha
Couch Scalf. It has been stated that they were the parents of 19 children by
1845. The original deposition by Patsy does state 19 children. However, Brittan
and Talitha had nine living children on the census of 1840 in Russell County,
Virginia. There is absolutely no way that this writer can determine that it
would have been possible for Brittan and Talitha to have ten more children by
the year 1845. It is stated in Chronicles of the Scalf Family that a grandson
stated he knew only of nine children in this family. There are many assumptions
that can be made as to how this number became 19 in the deposition.
My conclusion to this is,
Patsy may have stated when giving her detailed information that Brittan had
“nine or ten” children and the clerk heard nineteen. Brittan is not listed as
head of house on the 1830 census of Russell County. Therefore, we can only
assume that he was not married at this time. Neither is he listed on the 1820
census as head of house and was most likely the son between the age of 16-18
years old on this census.
If he married and was
living in his father’s home in 1830, then his age is stated wrong on this census
for Brittan would have been around
28-29 years old on the
1830 census. There is no male of this age in the home at this time. Due to these
factors, my only alternative is to conclude that Brittan and Talitha married
1820-1825 because the oldest child was born 1820-1825. If so, they were likely
in the home of John Sr. in 1830 because they are not on this census as head of
house. In view of the information, I am inclined to agree with the grandson of
Brittan and Talitha that there were not nineteen children in this family. It
certainly appears there was a mistake by someone in the deposition of Patsy
Counts Scalf. (Patsy Scalf-July, 1845) (Page
2) (Page 3)
In August of 1845, just
after the depositions in Hawkins County by his family, John made a trip to
Greeneville, (Greene County) Tennessee where he obtained the services of one, B.
McDaniels, Esquire to help him with the pension restoration. Most likely, his
children were paying the fee required for these services.
John Sr. had obtained the
services of almost every Justice of the Peace in office in Hawkins County since
1837. He now appealed to Mr. McDaniels, in Greene County. On August 13, 1845,
Mr. McDaniels sent another letter to Mr. Edwards requesting information
concerning the revocation of the pension. (McDaniels to Edwards-1845)
On August 20, 1845, Mr. Edwards returned a response to the letter stating that John was not entitled to
a pension “if the allegations be true.” Note that he said “if.” I assume this
to mean he did not know if they were true or not but simply because someone made
the statement that it was true, it was justified. (Edwards to McDaniels –
1845)
On September 2, 1845, Mr.
McDaniels sent a letter to Mr. G. W. Hopkins requesting a “listing of the whole
matter.” Mr. Hopkins answered this letter on September 13, 1845 from Abingdon,
(Washington County, Virginia). (McDaniels to Hopkins-1845) (Hopkins to McDaniels)
The efforts of Mr.
McDaniels proved useless, as had all the others in the past. Although it is not
a matter of record, it was probably through the persuasion of Mr. McDaniels that
John made one final attempt to have the pension and his honor restored. This
attempt was made through Mr. Andrew Johnson, a member of the House of
Representatives at this time.
Copyright (C) 2002-2008 by Margaret Fleenor, All Rights Reserved.